Category Archives: Nuts & Bolts

World Bank LPI 2023

The World Bank has published their Logistics Performance Index for the first time since 2018.

The LPI ranks countries on critical dimensions of trade including customs performance, infrastructure quality, and timeliness of shipments. The data used in the rankings are derived from a survey of logistics professionals answering questions about foreign countries with which they trade. Respondents are asked to identify their line of business (freight forwarder, transport operator, export/import trader, customs broker), typical freight mode utilized, and country in which they are working.

The index benchmarks six areas of performance and gives nations a score of 1-5 for each category. The categories are: 1) Efficiency of customs clearance process; measuring speed, simplicity, and predictability of formalities 2) Quality of trade related infrastructure; focusing on ports, railroads, and information technology 3) Ease of arranging competitive pricing for shipments; ability to compare rates and services on-line  4) Competence and quality of logistics services; in-country customs brokers, transport operators, and freight forwarders  5) Ability to track and trace shipments; transparency and availability of real time information and 6) Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination within scheduled time of arrival; Hardly Ever, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Nearly Always.

The Global Rankings show the US at 17th (tied with Republic of Korea), down from 14th in 2018.

See the rankings here: https://lpi.worldbank.org/international/global

Click here to see the methodology used in the Global Rankings: https://lpi.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/2023-04/Methodology_LPI_survey.pdf

Let’s break down the US performance in 2023 vs 2018 by category:

LPI Score; 3.8 down from 3.89

Efficiency of Customs; 3.7 down from 3.78

Infrastructure; 3.9 down from 4.05

Ease of Arranging Intl Shipments; 3.4 down from 3.51

Logistics Competence; 3.9 up from 3.87

Tracking and Tracing; 4.2 up from 4.09

Timeliness of shipments: 3.8 down from 4.08

While most of the scores have dropped slightly, the US’ overall ranking has dropped steadily. Here are the LPI average US rankings for previous years.

2023 tied for 17th.

2018 14th

2016 11th

2014 9th

2012 9th

Readers have commented that the size and complexity of the US economy makes comparisons with smaller countries difficult. This is a fair point. However, there is no question that the US has room for improvement in all six LPI dimensions.

Here are the top ten countries by LPI score for 2023:

Singapore   
Finland 
Denmark 
Germany 
Netherlands 
Switzerland 
Austria 
Belgium 
Canada 
Hong Kong SAR, China 

The full LPI 2023 Report includes more detail and suggestions for policy makers. Read the report here: https://lpi.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/2023-04/LPI_2023_report.pdf

  • For the bottom performers, the most important improvements are in customs clearance and infrastructure.
  • Mid-level logistics performers are showing progress with more countries clustered at an average score of 3 to 4.
  • Logistics services are showing resilience. Even with Covid induced disruptions overall scores in 2023 are broadly the same as in 2018.

The report identifies four performance groups:

  • Logistics Friendly- Top performing countries, most of which are high income (25)
  • Consistent Performers- Countries performing better than most in their income group (25)
  • Partial Performers- Indicates logistics constraints often seen in low and middle-income countries (46)
  • Poor Logistics Performers- these are the least developed nations (43)

While comparisons among nations with diverse economies and levels of development will always be difficult, the LPI can be used by individual countries to identify opportunities to improve.

Who’s Responsible?

Compliance is becoming more important for importers and exporters as CBP and BIS ramp up enforcement activities. Potential clients admit that they have allowed compliance to fall through the cracks or, after some initial steps, moved it to the “back burner”. The reasons for this are usually other priorities, cost, insufficient staffing, or belief that the business is too small.

One of my first questions for the client is “Who is responsible for compliance in the organization?” If they rely on their Customs Broker or LSP (Logistics Service Provider) I advise that these providers are good resources but that the client, as IOR (Importer of Record) or EOR (Exporter of Record), bears ultimate responsibility for compliance.

Sometimes compliance has been assigned to the shipping department or to an administrative staffer. While I can help with best practices and training, this is a poor arrangement. Compliance must be a front end process starting with order entry. Shippers are under pressure to get orders out the door. Administrative staffers have multiple responsibilities and may lack specific knowledge.

In house compliance professionals are often given responsibility without authority. Further, they may be at mid or lower management levels, or in the wrong chain of command. With or without a formal ECP (Export Compliance Program), compliance professionals must have the authority to place holds on questionable exports without being overruled by sales, finance, or supply chain. Well written protocols for resolving issues and releasing holds require C-level or legal approval.

All of the above illustrates the importance of compliance independence. This may mean reporting to the CEO, COO, or legal department in order to remove pressure from other groups.

So once again; “Who’s responsible?”

Contact mitch@adhoclogistics.com for immediate assistance.


LinkedIn Comment-Customs Brokers

Connor Helm Ocean Procurement Manager – Indian Subcontinent | Licensed Customs Broker

Hey Pete – under 30 licensed customs broker chiming in 👋. The high cost of the training courses are a huge barrier. Luckily my company sponsored me to take the test and paid for all expenses while also providing a raise in pay. That is how you incentivize young people to become LCBs. Alternatively schools like our alma maters should have a full credit elective that ends with you taking the exam. Each maritime academy has a business program full of students eager to separate themselves from traditional business students.

I also challenge the common saying that the brokers exam is harder to pass than the bar.. lawyers study for 3 years to take that test while many people sit for the brokers exam with little prep and less formal education.

Mitch Kostoulakos, LCB Ad Hoc Logistics LLC, Int’l Logistics Consultant/Licensed Customs Broker

Connor Helm Excellent point about the bar exam. I have no doubt that it is difficult even after 3 years of law school. Passing rates are reasonable though. Maybe a better comparison would be other license exams such as CPA.

LinkedIn Comment- Customs Brokers

Mitch Kostoulakos, LCB commented on this

Pete Mento•Commercial Director @ DSV | US Licensed Customs

Been a while since I poked the bear, but I’m fresh from a trip from DC and annoyed. We have a Customs Broker crisis. It’s only getting worse because of demographics. I’d like to challenge U.S. Customs and Border Protection to release some simple age statistics in tiers. What are the breakdown, by age of current license holders in the US? Assuming there are ACTUALLY around 13,000 still kicking around (I question the validity of that number), Then tell us how many are over 70, between 50 and 69, between 35 and 49 and under 34. You have that data since you have our SSNs. I’ll do some Good Will Hunting math with actuary tables and tell you, roughly how many are probably retiring and leaving this earthy plane (I love math and I have no life) Then I’ll make assumptions on the number not actually working on thier license (that number will disgust you). THEN – we look at how many take the test a year, pass it and pass the background check and get the ticket. I’m willing to bet it’s an upside down number. Want to fix it? It’s so easy…Apprenticship programs under the guidance of brokers and a system that requires time working in areas of the industry to learn the trade/Trade – then a test based more on practical knoweldge and less on repetitive questions. Being a Customs Broker is a financially and intellectually rewarding career. Stop making it so ridiculously hard to be one with your poorly conceived test. I’d also like to challenge our professional associations to help us bring more people into our tribe instead of looking for ways to monetize the new mandatory training hours. Unless we do something about this there won’t be anyone to train. Thanks for coming to my TED talk. I’ll be selling merch on your way out….#morebrokers…see moreinsightful

Mitch Kostoulakos, LCB Ad Hoc Logistics LLC, Int’l Logistics Consultant/Licensed Customs Broker

Excellent post Pete… I am in favor of continuing ed for LCBs. My thoughts on the CBLE:
1) Can anyone name another licensing exam with such low pass rates? I doubt it. Its is easier to pass the bar exam.
2) LCBs take a look at the April 2023 exam and see if you think you could pass it.

CBLE Question

Here is one of the easier questions from the April 2023 CBLE (Customs Broker License Exam). What’s your answer?

  1. Which of the following is a TRUE statement regarding the principles governing the
    classification of goods in the tariff schedule?
    A) For legal purposes, the Harmonized Tariff Schedule’s (HTS) table of contents,
    alphabetical index, and title of sections, chapters and sub-chapters are of equal
    weight to the terms of headings, relative section or chapter notes, and the General
    Rules of Interpretation in classifying goods under the tariff schedule.
    B) For legal purposes, under the governing principles for the classification of goods
    in the tariff schedule, the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) Explanatory Notes
    are required to be applied, unless the HTS headings or notes otherwise require.
    C) For legal purposes, the HTS General Rules of Interpretation (GRI) principles are
    applied in any sequence as long as all the GRIs are applied in classifying goods in
    the tariff schedule.
    D) For legal purposes, the classification of goods in the subheadings of a heading
    shall be determined according to the terms of those subheadings and any related
    subheading notes with the understanding that subheadings at any level are
    comparable.
    E) For legal purposes, classification is determined according to the terms of the
    headings and any relative section or chapter notes, while the table of contents,
    alphabetical index, and titles of sections, chapters and sub-chapters are provided
    for ease of reference.

Careful HTS Classifications

Customs Brokers are often asked for “quick classifications”. In fact, it may be possible to quickly find plausible codes for clients’ commodities; but that can be malpractice by the broker. Compliance adds value through attention to detail, established protocols, oversight, and documentation. HTS classification is the first step in both export and import compliance.

Proper classification includes HTS lookup, GRI (General Rules of Interpretation) review, checking both chapter and additional notes, as well as CROSS (Customs Rulings Online Search System). For some commodities it may be necessary to consult with a subject matter expert in engineering, purchasing, or manufacturing for details about the item.

This is the procedural aspect of classification, but there is more. Most listings require interpretation of the tariff language based on experience. Finally, the process needs to be documented for future reference and parts lists updated.

Here is an example of an easy classification with no research or interpretation needed:

9506.69.2040 Baseballs

Here is one which is more challenging and time consuming:

8532.10.0000 Fixed capacitors designed for use in 50/60 Hz circuits and having a reactive power handling capacity of not less than 0.5 kvar (power capacitors).

For accurate classification help contact mitch@adhoclogistics.com.