Do you want to get a handle on export compliance in 2015? Implementing a formal Export Management Compliance Program can be quite intimidating and expensive, especially for small and medium sized companies. An EMCP requires a significant commitment of time on the part of management and usually involves hiring an outside consultant for the initial set up. There is no question that a written EMCP is a good investment for any company to make. An EMCP establishes clear accountability, written instructions, and reduces risk of non compliance. If the exporter has not experienced problems or incurred any fines it is easy to make an EMCP a “back burner” issue. If your company has not implemented an EMCP it is still good business practice to take some basic compliance steps. While these steps cannot take the place of a written EMCP they will help reduce risk of non compliance. To get started I suggest the following:
Review and confirm correct Harmonized and Schedule B codes
Check EAR regulations for correct exception codes and license or NLR designations
If exporting under ITAR you need a responsible trained officer
Check common “Red Flags” such as denied parties lists, entities lists, and unverified lists
Review export documentation for possible improvements
In a previous post I discussed Red Flags to be aware of in export transactions. Here is more detail from the Bureau of Industry and Security about the Consolidated Screening List. The Department of Commerce lists that are included in the Consolidated Screening List are: Denied Persons List, Unverified List, and Entity List. For help with export compliance contact mitch@52.91.45.227
Consolidated Screening List
Prior to taking any further actions, users are to consult the requirements of the specific list on which the company, entity or person is identified by reviewing the webpage of the agency responsible for such list. The links below will connect you to the specific webpage where additional information about how to use each specific list is contained.
Department of Commerce – Bureau of Industry and Security
Denied Persons List– Individuals and entities that have been denied export privileges. Any dealings with a party on this list that would violate the terms of its denial order are prohibited.
Unverified List – End-users who BIS has been unable to verify in prior transactions. The presence of a party on this list in a transaction is a “Red Flag” that should be resolved before proceeding with the transaction.
Entity List – Parties whose presence in a transaction can trigger a license requirement supplemental to those elsewhere in the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). The list specifies the license requirements and policy that apply to each listed party.
Here is a list from the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) website of things to look for in an export transaction. My next post will discuss “Lists of Parties of Concern” including “Denied Persons”. Make sure you are not doing business with the bad guys. A little due diligence up front saves a lot of trouble later on.
The customer or its address is similar to one of the parties found on the Commerce Department’s [BIS’] list of denied persons.
The customer or purchasing agent is reluctant to offer information about the end-use of the item.
The product’s capabilities do not fit the buyer’s line of business, such as an order for sophisticated computers for a small bakery.
The item ordered is incompatible with the technical level of the country to which it is being shipped, such as semiconductor manufacturing equipment being shipped to a country that has no electronics industry.
The customer is willing to pay cash for a very expensive item when the terms of sale would normally call for financing.
The customer has little or no business background.
The customer is unfamiliar with the product’s performance characteristics but still wants the product.
Routine installation, training, or maintenance services are declined by the customer.
Delivery dates are vague, or deliveries are planned for out of the way destinations.
A freight forwarding firm is listed as the product’s final destination.
The shipping route is abnormal for the product and destination.
Packaging is inconsistent with the stated method of shipment or destination.
When questioned, the buyer is evasive and especially unclear about whether the purchased product is for domestic use, for export, or for re-export.
In the September issue of Logistics Management Magazine, Mark Pearson has written an excellent article on supply chain risk management (Pearson on Excellence p.22). Based on a survey of senior executives, the article names information technology and global economic turmoil as the most common and impactful drivers of supply chain risk. Pearson describes different supply chain risk management investments made by respondents and the ROI’s reported by management. I would add that export and import compliance is also a very big risk factor in supply chain management. Fines and penalties for non-compliance are high enough to be worthy of C-level attention. What you don’t know can hurt you.
First of all, I think it may be worthwhile to say a few words about “trade compliance.” It may mean a lot of different things to different folks so I want to establish at least a baseline working…more
Mitch Kostoulakos CTL,LCBThis is a good summary of compliance topics. Its useful as a checklist or starting place.
Imports into the United States must be properly classified in the HTSUS tariff schedules, officially known as the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”). The HTSUS is based off the…more
Mitch Kostoulakos CTL,LCBGood info for importers and shows that due diligence is needed. I always recommend a review of classifications a couple of times per year.
Contact mitch@52.91.45.227 for review of your classifications.
After great anticipation the ATACarnet EEI/AES Exemption Final Rule was published today! www.EEIforATACarnet.com
Mitch Kostoulakos CTL,LCBThis is great news. Carnets are excellent tools for simplifying the importation of commercial samples, professional equipment, and goods for trade shows.
This afternoon I participated in a webinar presented by Customs Info/Descartes on “Best Practices in Global Classification Compliance”. The first half of the webinar consisted of a good refresher about classification compliance. The Customs Modification Act requirement of reasonable care was defined as a solid process of research support and documentation. The presenter reminded the audience that:
Classification is subjective- tariff schedules do not necessarily keep up with technology
Customs definitions can differ from industry definitions
Different interpretations exist between countries and also between ports within the same country
The basic components of a best in class process are:
Break down items from universe into groups
Research- even if you think you know the correct classification customsinfo.com is a good tool
Identify necessary info needed for classification such as materials, dimensions, intended use, etc
Documentation- needed to support your determination
Automation- implementing a software classification tool will improve efficiency and productivity
On-going maintenance and monitoring for changes in HTS binding rulings and in your products is essential
Supporting documentation includes
spec sheets, drawings, photos
info requests from engineers, scientists, chemists, etc
HTS chapter and section notes that apply to your product
explanatory notes
informed compliance publications
customs rulings that apply to your product
record keeping (5 years)
Contact Ad Hoc Logistics for help with classification and compliance.
Many exporters automatically enter EAR 99 on their shipping documents without really knowing what this designation means. EAR 99 is a basket category for items that are subject to the EAR (Export Administration Regulations) but not on the CCL (Commerce Control List). The CCL lists “controlled” items which may require a license for export. The CCL is made up of a classification of items by ECCN (Export Control Classification Number). So a basic export compliance step is to verify if your items are “controlled” needing an ECCN or if they can be shipped under EAR 99. If an ECCN is listed you then need to determine if a license is required by checking “Reasons for Control” and destination country lists. There are 3 ways to determine an ECCN:
1) Check with the manufacturer, producer, or developer.
2) Self classify using the CCL.
3) Official request to BIS (Bureau of Industry and Security) using the SNAP-R tool @ bis.gov
In a previous post I discussed the importance of an Export Management Compliance Program. Implementing an EMCP is a major undertaking so it is often delayed for lack of resources. While you may be in this position, there are still valid export compliance steps that you can take. The first step in export compliance is to review Schedule B codes used for export and confirm that AES entries are correct. On 6/24 I participated in a Census Bureau webinar titled “The Basics of Export Compliance: Classifying Your Product”. This training proved to be a good review for me and would be very helpful for export compliance novices. Topics covered included:
Schedule B search engine demo
How to use headings
Difference between Harmonized codes and Schedule B
In depth discussion of the 6 General Rules of Interpretation
“Essential Character” defined
“End Use” determination
Ad Hoc Logistics can help your company with export compliance. If you need help with Schedule B codes contact adhoclogistics.com
International Logistics Consulting; Licensed Customs Brokers